On Nov 9, 2007 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Todd A. Cook" <tcook@blackducksoftware.com> writes:
> > I saw the item in the release notes about the new "return query"
> > syntax in pl/pgsql, but I didn't see any note about "query" being
> > reserved now. Perhaps an explicit mention should be added?
>
> Yeah, I got burnt by that too. I have a bad feeling that that keyword
> is going to cause trouble for a lot of people.
>
> [ thinks for a bit... ] It might be possible to get rid of the keyword
> and have RETURN QUERY be recognized by an ad-hoc strcmp test, much like
> the various direction keywords in FETCH have been handled without making
> them real keywords. It'd be a bit uglier but it'd avoid making QUERY
> be effectively a reserved word.
It's not uncommon to have auditing triggers store things in tables
with fields named query in them. I know I have a few places that do
this...
Just sayin'