Re: select count() out of memory
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: select count() out of memory |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcc563d10710250744v60f8ffd3ob3b577af29bfe3ec@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: select count() out of memory (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/25/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > tfinneid@student.matnat.uio.no wrote: > >> I did a test previously, where I created 1 million partitions (without > >> data) and I checked the limits of pg, so I think it should be ok. > > > Clearly it's not. > > You couldn't have tested it too much --- even planning a query over so > many tables would take forever, and actually executing it would surely > have run the system out of locktable space before it even started > scanning. > > The partitioning facility is designed for partition counts in the tens, > or maybe hundreds at the most. I've had good results well into the hundreds, but after about 400 or so, things start to get a bit wonky.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: