On 9/5/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <lists@planetcobalt.net> wrote:
> On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On 9/5/07, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <lists@planetcobalt.net> wrote:
> >> On 2007-09-05 Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >>> And there's the issue that with windows / NTFS that when one process
> >>> opens a file for read, it locks it for all other users. This means
> >>> that things like virus scanners can cause odd, unpredictable
> >>> failures of your database.
> >>
> >> Uh... what? Locking isn't done by the filesystem but by applications
> >> (which certainly can decide to not lock a file when opening it). And
> >> no one in his right mind would ever have a virus scanner access the
> >> files of a running database, regardless of operating system or
> >> filesystem.
> >
> > Exactly, the default is to lock the file. The application has to
> > explicitly NOT lock it. It's the opposite of linux.
>
> Yes. So? It's still up to the application, and it still has nothing at
> all to do with the filesystem.
And if you look at my original reply, you'll see that I said WINDOWS /
NTFS. not just NTFS. i.e. it's a windowsism.
>
> > And be careful, you're insulting a LOT of people who have come on this
> > list with the exact problem of having their anti-virus scramble the
> > brain of their postgresql installation. It's a far more common
> > problem than it should be.
>
> How does that make it any less stup^Wintellectually challenged?
It doesn't. It's just not necessary to insult people to make a point.