Re: Remove distprep

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Remove distprep
Дата
Msg-id da4f62f2-54dd-cdc7-2c20-03fbb56b1325@eisentraut.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove distprep  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Ответы Re: Remove distprep  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Remove distprep  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14.07.23 10:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.07.23 09:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck 
>>>> b/src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck
>>>> index 4e09c4686b..287395887c 100755
>>>> --- a/src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck
>>>> +++ b/src/tools/pginclude/cpluspluscheck
>>>> @@ -134,6 +134,9 @@ do
>>>>       test "$f" = src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/preproc.h && continue
>>>>       test "$f" = src/test/isolation/specparse.h && continue
>>>>
>>>> +    # FIXME
>>>> +    test "$f" = src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_internal.h && continue
>>>> +
>>>>       # ppport.h is not under our control, so we can't make it 
>>>> standalone.
>>>>       test "$f" = src/pl/plperl/ppport.h && continue
>>>
>>> Hm, what's that about?
>>
>> Don't remember ... ;-)  I removed this.
> 
> Ah, there was a reason.  The headerscheck and cpluspluscheck targets 
> need jsonpath_gram.h to be built first.  Which previously happened 
> indirectly somehow?  I have fixed this in the new patch version.  I also 
> fixed the issue that Álvaro reported nearby.

Apparently, the headerscheck and cpluspluscheck targets still didn't 
work right in the Cirrus jobs.  Here is an updated patch to address 
that.  This is also rebased over some recent changes that affected this 
patch (generated wait events stuff).

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jian he
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL 16 release announcement draft
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby