Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonathan S. Katz
Тема Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Дата
Msg-id da260600-c214-8531-dd55-6f334726bdc5@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7/2/20 11:47 AM, James Coleman wrote:
> It seems like the consensus over at another discussion on this topic
> [1] is that we ought to go ahead and print the zeros [for machine
> readable output formats], even though that creates some interesting
> scenarios like the fact that disk sorts will print 0 for memory even
> though that's not true.
>
> The change has already been made and pushed for hash disk spilling, so
> I think we ought to use Justin's patch here.

Do people agree with James analysis? From the RMT perspective, we would
like to get this open item wrapped up for the next beta, given[1] is now
resolved.

Thanks!

Jonathan

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpBQx4Shmisjp7oKr%3DECX18KYKPB%3DKpdWYxMKQNvisgvQ%40mail.gmail.com


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: output columns of \dAo and \dAp
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!?