Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
| От | Tomas Vondra |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | d9db8cf3-fc6d-599d-697e-bd55dc8b24cd@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/25/23 12:20, Amit Kapila wrote:
> ...
>
> I have used the debugger to reproduce this as it needs quite some
> coordination. I just wanted to see if the sequence can go backward and
> didn't catch up completely before the sequence state is marked
> 'ready'. On the publisher side, I created a publication with a table
> and a sequence. Then did the following steps:
> SELECT nextval('s') FROM generate_series(1,50);
> insert into t1 values(1);
> SELECT nextval('s') FROM generate_series(51,150);
>
> Then on the subscriber side with some debugging aid, I could find the
> values in the sequence shown in the previous email. Sorry, I haven't
> recorded each and every step but, if you think it helps, I can again
> try to reproduce it and share the steps.
>
Amit, can you try to reproduce this backwards movement with the latest
version of the patch? I have tried triggering that (mis)behavior, but I
haven't been successful so far. I'm hesitant to declare it resolved, as
it's dependent on timing etc. and you mentioned it required quite some
coordination.
Thanks!
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: