Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Дата
Msg-id d99fa72cec855bf84064f74e4b576c72a9a6d033.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 18:42 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> We still need to put the reliance on ltsWriteBlock() allocating many
> blocks before they've been logically written on some kind of formal
> footing for Postgres 13 -- it is now possible that an all-zero block
> will be left behind even after we're done writing and have flushed
> all
> temp buffers, which is a new thing.

Is the current direction of this thread (i.e. the two posted patches)
addressing your concern here?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiro Ikeda
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers