On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:08:20 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations
> > > were kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated
> > > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and
> > > committing all the time.
> >
> > That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the
> > "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree
> > contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group,
> > thus blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying
> > necessary fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner.
> > Let's consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle.
>
> OK, is anyone opposed to this idea? I would register a pgfoundry
> project (name suggestions? "translations"?), give most established
> translators commit access, and move the statistics pages there. Also,
> some translation groups seem to have their own mailing lists or web
> pages, which could optionally also be hosted there.
>
> We could then sync the translations either regularly (e.g., once a week)
> or only at release time. Of course we would need to mirror all the
> branches there.
>
> Comments?
Perfectly fine. Please go ahead.
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
Nicolai Tufar
Turkish Language Translation Team.