Re: [PATCH] Add `headerscheck` run_target to meson
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add `headerscheck` run_target to meson |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | d7e02e4d-df63-422a-a865-44e321787fb3@eisentraut.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add `headerscheck` run_target to meson (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.03.26 16:36, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 at 14:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: >> >> On 18.03.26 11:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> >>> Committed that, but without the regular expression changes. I don't >>> understand why those would be needed. Please provide more information >>> if necessary. It worked for me without it. > > It is working now. I can't reproduce the problem, it looks like it is > already fixed. > > >> I need another tweak for the cpluspluscheck. >> >> In meson, the distribution of the include flags between CPPFLAGS, >> CFLAGS, and CXXFLAGS ends up being a bit different, and we need to get a >> few -I options from CXXFLAGS in my case. >> >> I have attached two different variants for how to do this. The first >> one just gets the -D and -I flags from CXXFLAGS. This preserves most of >> the existing behavior. The second aligns more with how CFLAGS works and >> removes the ability to override CXXFLAGS from the command line. This is >> probably now better since we have more support for getting correct CXX >> and CXXFLAGS in the build system. But it might be a change for some users. >> >> Thoughts? > > I think we can go with the second variant first. If there is a > complaint, we can then consider switching to the first one. Does that > sound good? Also, second patch probably needs to remove lines below > from the src/tools/pginclude/README: > > ``` > If you are using a non-g++-compatible C++ compiler, you may need to > override the script's CXXFLAGS setting by setting a suitable environment > value. > ``` Ok, done that way.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: