Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Дата
Msg-id d799a3f9-162d-2e71-116a-b67183158cbf@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/10/17 15:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> Right.  I can't see why you'd want to be able to separately control
> those two things.  If you're not dumping, you don't want to load; if
> you're not loading, you don't want to dump.

What about the case where you want to prewarm a standby from the info
from the primary (or another standby)?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Json support for array pseudotypes