On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
Things I'd particularly like to have that aren't entirely on the map yet:
- In place upgrade
- Stored procedures that can manage transactions (e.g. - contrast with
present stored functions that forcibly live *inside* a transaction
context; the point isn't functions vs procedures, but rather to have
something that can do txn management)
I'd expect that txn-managing procedures could then enable various
sorts of usages involving other interesting bits:
- Managing 2PC
- Managing NOTIFY/LISTEN
- Managing jobs (e.g. - "pgcron")
- Using dblink()/SQL-MED to manage cross-DB work
I'd expect these all to be the sorts of side-effects enabled by the
one change...
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
Calvin Trillin - "Health food makes me sick."