Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Дата
Msg-id d4dc656f-8eab-ecf2-4ad4-b4d4e1b317e1@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Ответы Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
> but it was not necessary.
> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.

So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at first.
Then we can improve the docs if required.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index
Следующее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function