Re: Remove pg_strtouint64(), use strtoull() directly

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Remove pg_strtouint64(), use strtoull() directly
Дата
Msg-id d104ce6d-cb3e-6b80-9fab-0b7cb27f9d62@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove pg_strtouint64(), use strtoull() directly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Remove pg_strtouint64(), use strtoull() directly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 10.12.21 16:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Our experience with the variable size of "long" has left a sufficiently
> bad taste in my mouth that I'm not enthused about adding hard-wired
> assumptions that "long long" is identical to int64.  So this seems like
> it's going in the wrong direction, and giving up portability that we
> might want back someday.

What kind of scenario do you have in mind?  Someone making their long 
long int 128 bits?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: row filtering for logical replication