Re: Postgres Crashing
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Crashing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | d0e33a60-c26c-0d52-0935-134c7c1a8fa5@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres Crashing (Doug Roberts <h205881@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Crashing
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2/4/20 6:20 AM, Doug Roberts wrote: >> So how did containers_reset_recirc() come to clash with >> containers_add_update()? > > They are clashing because another portion of our system is running and > updating containers. The reset recirc function was run at the same time > to see how our system and the database would handle it. So does your system have the things Tom mentioned below?: "The known bugs in that area require either before-row-update triggers on the table, or child tables (either partitioning or traditional inheritance). So I wonder what the schema of table "containers" looks like." > > The recirc string is formatted like 2000=3,1000=6,5000=0. So the reset > recirc function with take a UID (1000 for example) and use that to > remove 1000=x from all of the recirc counts for all of the containers > that have 1000=x. > > We are currently using PG 12.0. > > Thanks, > > Doug > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:21 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us > <mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>> wrote: > > Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com > <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> writes: > > Please reply to list also. > > > On 2/3/20 2:18 PM, Doug Roberts wrote: > >> Here is what the reset recirc function is doing. > >> ... > >> UPDATE containers > >> ... > > > So how did containers_reset_recirc() come to clash with > > containers_add_update()? > > If this is PG 12.0 or 12.1, a likely theory is that this is an > EvalPlanQual bug (which'd be triggered during concurrent updates > of the same row in the table, so that squares with the observation > that locking the table prevents it). The known bugs in that area > require either before-row-update triggers on the table, or > child tables (either partitioning or traditional inheritance). > So I wonder what the schema of table "containers" looks like. > > Or you could have hit some new bug ... but there's not enough > info here to diagnose. > > regards, tom lane > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: