Re: Small table or partial index?
| От | Francisco Reyes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Small table or partial index? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | cone.1134490135.372863.79998.1000@zoraida.natserv.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Small table or partial index? (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby writes: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 06:28:09PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: >> I am in the process of designing a new system. >> There will be a long list of words such as >> >> -word table >> word_id integer >> word varchar >> special boolean >> >> Some "special" words are used to determine if some work is to be done and >> will be what we care the most for one type of operation. > > Tough call. The key here is the amount of time required to do a join. It > also depends on if you need all the special words or not. Your best bet > is to try and benchmark both ways. In your opinion do you think performance will be comparable? I am hoping I will have time to test, but not sure if will have time and the tables will be pretty large. :-(
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: