On 22 Nov 2004 19:44:10 GMT, Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>kmorgan@spamcop.net (Kathy Morgan) wrote in
>news:1gnn5wf.1has9tync90mrN%kmorgan@spamcop.net:
>
>> I think the reality of Usenet is that servers which currently carry the
>> bogus group c.d.p.general are unlikely to remove it even if a valid
>> group c.d.p. were created and messages from the mailing list
>> c.d.p.general re-directed to c.d.p. People using those servers would
>> see both the c.d.p. and c.d.p.general traffic, Google would continue to
>> carry the bogus group, and discussion would remain splintered.
>>
>> Since there are already servers including Google that carry the group
>> with the .general node, if a new valid group is created it should carry
>> the .general name.
>
>Google has just blocked posting access to *all* of the PostgreSQL groups.
>If you look at the Google Groups interface for each group, it says "This
>group is no longer archived". They probably started receiving complaints
>that the groups were not Big-8 sanctioned and decided to pull them. Way to
>go, Google.
It looks like the best solution to the problem of a list owner who
refuses to correct the problem.
>I'm sure they would reinstate any of the groups that pass a
>CFV.
No doubt.
--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! http://signup.databasix.com
===========================================================================