On 5/31/17 02:17, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd say we can fix this issue by just changing the query. Attached
>> patch changes the query so that it can handle publication name
>> correctly, the query gets complex, though.
>>
> In is_publishable_class function, there are four conditions to decide
> whether this is a publishable class or not.
>
> 1. relkind == RELKIND_RELATION
> 2. IsCatalogClass()
> 3. relpersistence == 'p'
> 4. relid >= FirstNormalObjectId /* Skip tables created during initdb */
>
> I think the modified query should have a check for the fourth condition as well.
The query should be fixed like in the attached patch.
pg_get_publication_tables() ends up calling is_publishable_class()
internally.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers