Re: Bug: Missing check_stack_depth() in GRAPH_TABLE rewriter

On 15.04.26 17:07, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Thanks for the report. I could reproduce the segfault on my laptop.
> The attached patch fixes it and gives ERROR:  stack depth limit
> exceeded.
> 
> generate_queries_for_path_pattern_recurse() - has to work in a linear
> fashion since the elements need to be processed in an order. Each
> permutation of elements produces one query. These queries can be
> arranged in a balanced tree as you  suggest OR when constructing the
> setop tree we could generate it in divide-and-conquer manner. However,
> the tree will be flattened in the planner anyway (See
> flatten_simple_union_all() and pull_up_simple_union_all()). Thus the
> final planning will require a deeper stack anyway. The code complexity
> doesn't seem to be worth it.
> 
> I also looked at a few commits that add check_stack_depth() to see if
> we add tests for these scenarios. But I didn't find any. So no tests
> added with this commit.

committed

(I moved the #include "miscadmin.h" to a more alphabetical position.)