Re: BUG #10785: error if using x>n AND x

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От BM-2cUR7NEMQCynXF7KDxiMP1J9CMpmKA5Bd5@bitmessage.ch
Тема Re: BUG #10785: error if using x>n AND x
Дата
Msg-id cf66d059753444c7ec4b00295dd8b0b9@bitmessage.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #10785: error if using x>n AND x  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Yes, you're right. It is my fault. The "population" column contains non-n=
umeric data.=0AThanks for reply.=0AOn Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 20:18, "Tom La=
ne"  wrote:lunda@bitmessage.ch (mailto:lunda@bitmessage.ch) writes:=0ADOE=
S NOT WORK (ERROR:  invalid input syntax for integer: "tower"):=0Acreate =
index planet_osm_point_city_50k_index on planet_osm_point using=0Agist(wa=
y) where =0A(((capital IS NULL) OR (capital  'yes'::text)) AND =0A(place =
=3D ANY ('{city,town}'::text[])) AND =0A(population IS NOT NULL) AND (pop=
ulation  ''::text) AND =0A(regexp_replace(population, '[., ]', '')::int >=
=3D 50000) AND =0A(regexp_replace(population, '[., ]', '')::int < 100000)=
);=0A=0AYou haven't provided nearly enough information for anyone else to=
=0Areproduce this problem, but I suppose that the error occurs because=0A=
you have some non-numeric entries in "population".  You'll need to=0Acode=
 those tests more defensively, perhaps with a CASE that checks=0Athat the=
 string is numeric before trying to cast it.=0A=0AProbably the "working" =
examples accidentally fail to fail because=0Aof the order the planner cho=
oses to apply the qual expressions in.=0AIt's not a bug that they're not =
necessarily done left-to-right; see=0Ahttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/=
static/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-EXPRESS-EVAL (http://www.postgresql.or=
g/docs/9.3/static/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-EXPRESS-EVAL)=0A=0A        =
 regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #10785: error if using x>n AND x
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts