RE: PL/Python SD dict wiped?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ken Huffman
Тема RE: PL/Python SD dict wiped?
Дата
Msg-id cf086f1d38e4473ba79d403bc7c99438@EXCH13.corp.westell.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PL/Python SD dict wiped?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: PL/Python SD dict wiped?
Список pgsql-hackers
I'm fine with per-session initializing of prepared statements, but is there PL/Python mechanism that spans sessions to minimize ConfigParser calls?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 10:23 AM
To: Ken Huffman <KHuffman@westell.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL/Python SD dict wiped?

Ken Huffman <KHuffman@westell.com> writes:
> But if I quit and restart psql and do a subsequent db update, the SD dict is empty again and the one-time logic has to run again. What is clearing the dict? Is that expected?

You've got a new backend process. That dict (or any other Python state) is only kept within a session.

regards, tom lane


Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel append plan instability/randomness
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries