Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martin Atukunda
Тема Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case
Дата
Msg-id ce92d7150608250803x7861d577ob50a40ff5625ab46@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-patches
On 8/21/06, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> > > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 19:27 +0300, Martin Atukunda wrote:
> > >> If readline is used by psql, a history file is automatically used.
> > >> This patch adds the special file name 'none', which if set as the
> > >> HISTFILE parameter, will cause psql not to use the history file.
> >
> > > I think it would be cleaner to use a separate \set variable to control
> > > whether a history file is written, rather than needlessly overloading
> > > the meaning of HISTFILE.
> >
> > Why is this useful at all?  There's already the -n (don't use readline)
> > switch.
>
> Seems he wants readline without history, perhaps for security.  Doesn't
> setting HISTFILE to /dev/null work?
>
hmm, setting HISTFILE to /dev/null doesn't work on my MacOSX here. so
I whipped up this patch.

- Martin -

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Böszörményi Zoltán
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case