Re: amcheck verification for GiST
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: amcheck verification for GiST |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ce71440c-a481-d0d7-b9de-61cd78dad77c@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: amcheck verification for GiST (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: amcheck verification for GiST
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
There's a little copy-pasto in gist_check_page_keys():
> + for (o = FirstOffsetNumber; o <= parent_maxoff; o = OffsetNumberNext(i))
Should be "OffsetNumberNext(o)".
I tested this patch with your testing patch from the other thread (after
fixing the above), to leave behind incompletely split pages [1]. It
seems that the amcheck code doesn't expect incomplete splits:
postgres=# SELECT gist_index_parent_check('x_c_idx');
ERROR: index "x_c_idx" has inconsistent records
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/EB87A69B-EE5E-4259-9EEB-DA9DC1F7E265%40yandex-team.ru
- Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: