Re: interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cdbd6fa7-e2b6-caa8-3f57-74f954765893@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 30.09.22 06:07, Andres Freund wrote: > When tap tests are interrupted (e.g. with ctrl-c), we don't cancel running > postgres instances etc. That doesn't strike me as a good thing. > > In contrast, the postgres instances started by pg_regress do terminate. I > assume this is because pg_regress starts postgres directly, whereas tap tests > largely start postgres via pg_ctl. pg_ctl will, as it should, start postgres > without a controlling terminal. Thus a ctrl-c won't be delivered to it. I ran into the problem recently that pg_upgrade starts the servers with pg_ctl, and thus without terminal, and so you can't get any password prompts for SSL keys, for example. Taking out the setsid() call in pg_ctl.c fixed that. I suspect this is ultimately the same problem. We could make TAP tests and pg_upgrade not use pg_ctl and start postmaster directly. I'm not sure how much work that would be, but seeing that pg_regress does it, it doesn't seem unreasonable. Alternatively, perhaps we could make a mode for pg_ctl that it doesn't call setsid(). This could be activated by an environment variable. That might address all these problems, too.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: