On 12/13/18 8:35 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 12/12/18 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:54:05AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
>
>>> But, we could at least use the . notation and end up with something like
>>> 000000010000000100000001.00000002.partial or perhaps
>>> 000000010000000100000001.T00000002.partial? Maybe
>>> 000000010000000100000001.00000002.tpartial?
>>>
I updated the patch to use 000000010000000100000001.00000002.partial
since this is more consistent with what we do in other cases.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net