Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vlad
Тема Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?
Дата
Msg-id cd70c6810612211201j5fbca0f6q2fa9053ac18aa372@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Ответы Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?  (Marc Evans <Marc@SoftwareHackery.Com>)
Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?  ("Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 12/21/06, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:

>> Given the same physical hardware, which one is likely to perform better? Does
>> it make any difference? Does using separate databases use more RAM than a
>> single database with a bunch of different tables?

Config files are global, so I doubt it.

if it's a web app with persistent connections, then splitting onto several databases may consume more RAM. Example: 100 apache clients connected to 3 databases creates 300 forked postmaster processes ; vs 100 apache clients connected to the same DB using three schemas only takes 100 postmasters

--  Vlad

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning Vs. Split Databases - performance?
Следующее
От: Tomasz Ostrowski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Password strength requirements