Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Verite
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Дата
Msg-id cd2c6d7d-6b16-45e0-9bd4-d403bbbe9056@manitou-mail.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
    Andres Freund wrote:

> > One option may be to leave that decision to the user by providing a
> > PQBatchAutoFlush(true|false) property, along with a PQBatchFlush()
> > function.
>
> What'd be the difference between PQflush() and PQbatchFlush()?

I guess no difference, I was just not seeing that libpq already provides
this functionality...

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] possible self-deadlock window after badProcessStartupPacket
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] shift_sjis_2004 related autority files are remaining