On 3/3/19 1:08 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>
> jsonb_util.c
> ============
>
> I see we're now handling NaN values in convertJsonbScalar(). Isn't it
> actually a bug that we don't do this already? Or is it not needed for
> some reason?
>
JSON standard numerics don't support NaN, Infinity etc., so I assume
this can only happen in a jsonpath expression being converted to a jsonb
value. If so, the new section should contain a comment to that effect,
otherwise it will be quite confusing.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services