Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Hallgren
Тема Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum
Дата
Msg-id cbc7p7$2iep$2@news.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity: Vbulletin Forum Software  ("Donnacha Mac Gloinn" <postgresql.org@donnacha.com>)
Ответы Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
""Donnacha Mac Gloinn"" <postgresql.org@donnacha.com> writes:
> Well, that's the problem, by deploying abstraction they ALLOW you to use
> PostgreSQL but they don't take advantage of it's strengths.  Or, indeed,
> MySQL's strengths!  What's the point?
>  ...
> As a simple matter of logic, you should never dilute your control unless
> there's a highly compelling reason.
>
You just answered your own question. An abstraction rocks too unless it's
badly written. It gives you full freedom to choose. While I don't doubt that
PostgreSQL is an excellent choice in most cases, there might be reasons not
to use it. The use of BSD licensed software is not an obvious choice in many
organisations. Personally, I'd never encourage anyone to hardcode an
application for a specific database.

"never dilute control" == "always use an abstraction"

Kind regards,

Thomas Hallgren


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Renato Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: RES: ENC: PostgreSQL: Uses cases and features
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: High-Profile Advocacy Opportunity:VbulletinForum