On 10/24/16 9:22 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I also split out the libpqwalreceiver rewrite to separate patch which
> does just the re-architecture and does not really add new functionality.
> And I did the re-architecture bit differently based on the review.
That looks good to me, and it appears to address the previous discussions.
I wouldn't change walrcv_xxx to walrcvconn_xxx. If we're going to have
macros to hide the internals, we might as well keep the names the same.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services