Re: A tiny improvement of psql
| От | Vik Fearing |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A tiny improvement of psql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | cac32bd7-f620-465d-8e1a-0300cfb2c321@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: A tiny improvement of psql (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A tiny improvement of psql
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/26/23 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Wang <kevinpgcloud@gmail.com> writes:
>> As you know, we can use the UP arrow key to get the previous command to
>> avoid extra typing. This is a wonderful feature to save the lives of every
>> DBA. However, if I type the commands like this sequence: A, B, B, B, B, B,
>> B, as you can see, B is the last command I execute.
>
>> But if I try to get command A, I have to press the UP key 7 times. I think
>> the best way is: when you press the UP key, plsql should show the command
>> that is different from the previous command, so the recall sequence should
>> be B -> A, not B -> B -> ... -> A. Then I only press the UP key 2 times to
>> get command A.
>
> This is driven by libreadline, not anything we control. I have
> seen the behavior you describe in some other programs, so I wonder
> whether it's configurable.
It is kind of something we control. Per the psql docs, setting
HISTCONTROL=ignoredups
will do the trick.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-psql.html#APP-PSQL-VARIABLES-HISTCONTROL
--
Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: