Re: PostgreSQL in Windows console and Ctrl-C

* From: MauMau [mailto:maumau307@gmail.com]

> From: "Christian Ullrich" <chris@chrullrich.net>

> > OK, here is the first draft against current master. It builds on Windows
> > with VS 2012 and on FreeBSD 10 with clang 3.3. I ran the regression
> > tests on Windows, they all pass.
> >
> > The changed behavior is limited to Windows, where it now silently
> > ignores Ctrl-C and Ctrl-Break when started via pg_ctl start.
> >
> > I don't think there is currently any support for switch-type long
> > options, so rather than invent my own, I squeezed the two lines I added
> > into postmaster.c where they fit best; unfortunately, the result is
> > quite ugly. I'll be happy to refine that if someone can give me a hint
> > on how to do it.
> 
> Overall, the patch seems good as it is based on the discussion.  I found a
> few problems:

Thank you for the review. I will rebase, retest, and resubmit as soon as I find the time, certainly sometime this
week.

> (2)
> Although I haven't tried, doesn't pg_ctl start fail on non-Windows
> platforms
> because of the following check?
> 
> !        if (opt == '-')
> !         ereport(ERROR,
> !           (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> !            errmsg("--%s requires a value",
> !             optarg)));

On non-Windows platforms, the --background option is not passed, and the option handling is unmodified except for an
additionalpair of braces. The postmaster does not pass the option to its children on any platform.
 

> And, in the postgres reference page,
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/app-postgres.html
> 
> there's a paragraph:
> 
> "The -- options will not work on FreeBSD or OpenBSD. Use -c instead. This
> is a bug in the affected operating systems; a future release of PostgreSQL
> willprovide a workaround if this is not fixed."
> 
> Would --background work on FreeBSD and OpenBSD (i.e. would pg_ctl start
> succeed)?  I don't have access to those platforms.

pg_ctl does not pass the option anywhere but on Windows, and postmaster.c does not recognize it anywhere else. If it is
encounteredon a platform where it does not make sense, it will be treated like any other (unknown) long option.
 

This is actually the weakest point of the existing patch, in my opinion. Jamming the long option handling into
postmaster.cby way of #ifdef WIN32 feels wrong, but I could not figure out a better way to do it.
 

> (3)
> --background will also be used by restart subcommand, won't it?
> 
> +     in a console window. It is used automatically by
> +     <command>pg_ctl</command> when called with the
> +     <option>start</option> subcommand.

Restart is implemented as stop/start, so, yes.

-- 
Christian