Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c96ea34f-1bbc-71e8-9330-3a1ff7201627@commandprompt.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2018 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > ... but I don't think it fixes that, because you couldn't send this new > request without making an assumption about the server version being > new enough to support it. My entire beef with making server_version_num > be GUC_REPORT is that it would encourage people to write client code that > fails outright against older servers. I'm afraid what you are suggesting > will be an equally attractive nuisance. It seems to me that is not our problem. Why do we care if some developer says, "I only work with 9.6"? If I am understanding your complaint. JD > > regards, tom lane > -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: