Re: Fix DROP PROPERTY GRAPH "unsupported object class" error
| От | Alex Guo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fix DROP PROPERTY GRAPH "unsupported object class" error |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c948abd3-7483-473c-a0e7-29c579c823fc@gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Fix DROP PROPERTY GRAPH "unsupported object class" error (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/5/26 2:00 PM, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 06:01:22PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 4:56 PM Bertrand Drouvot >> <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I can see the the instability locally with en_US.UTF-8 (gt before _gt) and I >>> can see that, for example sifaka, has en_US.UTF-8 in locales. So, modifying the >>> impacted query a bit to add COLLATE "C" in the attached. >>> >> I did wonder where the instability is coming from the new query - it's >> because now we are traversing the entire dependency tree which also >> contains array type of reltype. > Right. > >> I think we should just eliminate it >> from the result just like we are eliminating the rule. There is slight >> convenience in keeping the query as is - it need not change even >> though the columns returned by the function change and it's more >> readable. I also think that we don't need a type defined for a >> property graph - it doesn't contain any row as well as the shape of >> the result of GRAPH_TABLE depends upon the COLUMNS clause - so that's >> not fixed as well. I will start a separate thread for that discussion. > Yeah, now that 891a57c7394 is in, PFA a new version of the patch. This is just > a mandatory rebase and the COLLATE "C" removals. > > Regards, Thanks for the patch. The patch overall LGTM. There is a typo in the commit message: "manipulated invdividually through ALTER PROPERTY GRAPH sub-commands. Hence they” invdividually -> individually Regards, Alex Guo
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: