On 2/24/17 10:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> Those aren't actually equivalent, because of the !nodeptr. IsA() crashes
>> for NULL pointers, but the new code won't. Which means 9ba8a9ce4548b et
>> al actually weakened some asserts.
>
>> Should we perhaps have one NULL accepting version (castNodeNull?) and
>> one that separately asserts that ptr != NULL?
>
> -1 ... if you're going to use something in a way that requires it not to
> be null, your code will crash quite efficiently on a null, with or
> without an assert. I don't think we need the extra cogitive burden of
> two distinct macros for this.
I think we should just add some Assert(thepointer) where necessary.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services