Re: LATIN2 'bssz' and 'bszsz' fails on unique index
| От | CoL |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LATIN2 'bssz' and 'bszsz' fails on unique index |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c8l7eh$g4r$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: LATIN2 'bssz' and 'bszsz' fails on unique index (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
hi,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sün <sun@true.hu> writes:>>>If you use Latin2 encoding, you can not have 'bssz' and 'bszsz' in an>>unique column in
thesame time.>>> AFAICS this means that your locale definition considers these strings> equal.>> It is possible that
thereal problem comes from using an encoding that's> not compatible with what the locale setting expects. Locales
generally>do require a specific character set encoding, though this is poorly> documented :-(>
#createdb -U postgres -E=SQL_ASCII test
#psql test
test=# \encoding
SQL_ASCII
test=# \l
List of databases Name | Owner | Encoding
-------------+------------+----------- test | postgres | SQL_ASCII
test=# create TEMP table lala (string varchar(20));
CREATE TABLE
test=# CREATE UNIQUE INDEX lala_idx on lala (string);
CREATE INDEX
test=# insert INTO lala values ('bssz');
INSERT 757927 1
test=# insert INTO lala values ('bszsz');
ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "lala_idx"
How? Ok, its locale "bug" (not just int LATIN2, LATIN1), but why?
thx
C.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: