Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
Дата
Msg-id c8e0cded-a04e-32e5-d9f4-d01191707e69@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 8/14/17 23:55, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> pg_import_system_collations() should simply use uloc_countAvailable()
> + uloc_getAvailable, rather than ucol_countAvailable() +
> ucol_getAvailable().

It's not clear to me that this is better.  Why do we need to use a
function that is clearly not the preferred API for this ("col" vs "loc")
just to get more entries?  If we go down this route, then we'll be on
the hook forever to keep adding more and more predefined entries by
whatever means necessary.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values