On 13/08/17 16:19, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
[...]
>
> I'd vote for including this in v10. There doesn't seem to be any
> downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
> case when we can see it coming.
>
But explosions are fun!
< ducks, and runs away VERY rapidly>
More seriously:
Up to now I'd been avoiding hash indexes, so great news!
Cheers,
Gavin