Re: Insert only tables and vacuum performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joseph Shraibman
Тема Re: Insert only tables and vacuum performance
Дата
Msg-id c6s2rk$1qgd$1@news.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Insert only tables and vacuum performance  (Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>)
Ответы Re: Insert only tables and vacuum performance
Список pgsql-performance
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> I have a table that is never updated, only INSERTED into. Is there a way
> I can prevent vacuum wasting time on this table besides vacuuming each
> table in the db by itself and omitting this table?
>
> How feasable would it be to have a marker somewhere in pg that is
> "updated since last vacuum" that would be cleared when vacuum runs, and
> if set vacuum will ignore that table?

Or even better an offset into the datatable for the earliest deleted
row, so if you have a table where you update the row shortly after
insert and then never touch it vacuum can skip most of the table
(inserts are done at the end of the table, right?)

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: planner/optimizer question
Следующее
От: Joseph Shraibman
Дата:
Сообщение: why can't 2 indexes be used at once?