Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c6778430-e5be-4eb8-a05c-f6914b092f0c@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/04/2026 19:23, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> Both MultiXactShmemInit and MultiXactShmemAttach set >> OldestMemberMXactId, OldestVisibleMXactId. In future if we add another >> global variable to point to the shared memory, somebody needs to >> remember to initialize it in both these functions. Maybe deduplicate >> it with something like attached? Similarly for PredicateLock related >> changes. > > Sorry, I attached the wrong patch. Here's the right patch. Gotcha, yeah I've thought about that too. I even considered making ShmemInitRequested() automatically call all the attach callbacks after initialization, even in !EXEC_BACKEND builds. That way, you could put the backend-private steps only in the attach function, and have automatically be called in the postmaster too. I decided against it, because only few subsystems need the attach callback at all, and many of them need to do the "local" steps earlier in the init callback anyway. For example, XLOGShmemInit() uses the WALInsertLocks variable inside the function already. In the end I decided it's OK as it is. I'm not too worried about the duplicated code in multixact.c and predicate.c, they fit in the same screen in an editor so it's pretty easy to see that they are duplicated for a reason. With more complicated logic it would be a different story. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: