On 2/21/07, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> So yes, there would be a use case for specifying the physical column layout
> when pg_migrator is doing the pg_dump/restore. But pg_migrator could probably
> just update the physical column numbers itself. It's not like updating system
> catalog tables directly is any more of an abstraction violation than swapping
> files out from under the database...
If people are ok with that answer, then I'll gladly stop suggesting
that ALTER TABLE be able to explicitly set storage positions. I was
just trying to avoid forcing a tool like pg_migrator to muck with the
system catalogs.
phil