Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Дата
Msg-id c325bf61-d8f9-a496-35c7-c353d06031b4@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/23 20:07, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sex., 23 de jul. de 2021 às 07:02, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com
<mailto:aleksander@timescale.com>>escreveu:
 
> 
>     Hi hackers,
> 
>         The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
>         make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
>         Implements feature:       tested, passed
>         Spec compliant:           tested, passed
>         Documentation:            tested, passed
> 
>         The patch was tested on MacOS against master `80ba4bb3`.
> 
>         The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer
> 
> 
>     The second patch seems fine too. I'm attaching both patches to trigger cfbot and to double-check them.
> 
> Thanks Aleksander, for reviewing this.

I looked at these patches because they are marked as ready for committer.
They don't change any actual behavior, but look valid to me in term of coding.
Barring any objection, I will commit them.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints