On 7/8/08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova escribió:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The idea of this patch is to avoid the need to make explicit grants on
> > > sequences owned by tables.
> >
> > I've noted that the patch i attached is an older version that doesn't
> > compile because of a typo...
> > Re-attaching right patch and fix documentation to indicate the new behaviour...
>
> I had a look at this patch and it looks good. The only thing that's not
> clear to me is whether we have agreed we want this to be the default
> behavior?
>
mmm... i don't remember from where i took the equivalences...
i will review if there is any concensus in that...
anyway now i when people should speak about it...
>
> Wouldn't it be clearer to build a list with all the sequences owned by
> the tables in istmt.objects, and then call ExecGrantStmt_oids() a single
> time with the big list?
>
at night i will see the code for this...
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157