On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > 2008/5/1 Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Hello
> > > >>
> > > >> I found some bugs when I used base_lexer, so I returned back own
> > > >> lexer. It's only little bit longer, but simpler.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > you really compile this one? i get a complain because
> > > > read_sql_construct is called with 8 arguments and it should have only
> > > > 7..
> > >
> > > yes, I did it. 8 arguments are from EXECUTE USING patch
> > > http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.diff?r1=1.108;r2=1.109;f=h
> > >
> >
> > so, i need to see that patch first? patch that doesn't apply because
> > of changes in files (specially definitions moved to other files, but i
> > haven't checked all the .rej yet)
> >
>
> sorry, you mean already applied RETURN QUERY, right? i was thinking in
> pending patch RETURN QUERY EXECUTE... i will check again my files but
> i'm sure i have updated tu CVS TIP before try your patch
>
ok, you're right... sorry for the noise...
i will try it again
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 087171157