Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | c28a28f9-94d3-9708-8ab6-e11190ac82a6@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU (Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/1/17 02:12, Victor Wagner wrote: >> We are only calling uloc_toLanguageTag() with keyword/value >> combinations that ICU itself previously told us were supported. So >> just ignoring errors doesn't seem proper in this case. >> > We know that this version of ICU is broken. But what choice we have? I don't know that we can already reach that conclusion. Maybe the APIs have changed or we are not using them correctly. Are there any bug reports or changelog entries related to this? I don't think we should just give up and ignore errors. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: