On 3/28/20 1:30 AM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On 23/02/2020 02:23, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>> On 01/02/2020 01:31, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>> On 1/31/20 7:24 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>>>> On 01/02/2020 00:37, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>>>> On 1/31/20 5:50 PM, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> following a discussion how a number of not-so-known PostgreSQL
>>>>>> projects
>>>>>> can be made more visible, attached is a first draft to list them
>>>>>> on the
>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The draft lists three projects (pgweb, pgeu-system, pglister) as an
>>>>>> example, and moves the new site under "Community". More projects with
>>>>>> more description and contact details should be added, of course.
>>>>> Seems like a good way to get people more involved.
>>>>>
>>>>>> The purpose of this patch is to see if "Community" is the right place
>>>>>> for this kind of information, and also what other projects and
>>>>>> details
>>>>>> should be included.
>>>>> Are there any HTML templates? I only see the URL added in the context.
>>>> Actually, you are right. And the second part in my initial email just
>>>> repeated the "contexts.py" file, instead of adding the correct file.
>>>> Attached a new patch.
>>> OK, that makes much more sense ;)
>>>
>>> Feedback / bikeshedding:
>>>
>>> - I'd recommend putting the pith of the content in a subsection under
>>> "Developers". I don't see any issue linking to it from the community
>>> section (and perhaps rewriting the community page a bit to link to more
>>> of the "contributing areas", but the page is more about ways you can
>>> develop around things in PostgreSQL
>>>
>>> - I'm not sure how I feel about the term "Auxiliary" - it's not used so
>>> much any more and definitely prone to misspellings. Perhaps "Related
>>> Projects"?
>>>
>>> - I like the overall layout of the page and how there is content around
>>> each project. I think it's a good start.
>>
>> I moved the website over from "community" to "development", and
>> renamed it.
>>
>> I also added a couple more projects, but ideas are still welcome.
>
> While working on GSoC projects, I found a couple more candidates
> for this website. New patch attached, still applies clean on pgweb.
looking at this I'm not sure why you added the lcov/code coverage to the
list - I find that going way to far in terms of what "the community"
uses, if we really go that far we need to add a ton of more or less
random pieces of software(homegrown or not).
Stefan