Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John R Pierce
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?
Дата
Msg-id c1250d7b-530f-cc37-1e59-74b7c54f2e2b@hogranch.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?  (Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@lists.simkin.ca>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Список pgsql-general
On 5/4/2017 2:28 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2017 14:21:00 John R Pierce wrote:
or EBS, and I've heard from more than a few people that EBS can be
something of a sand trap.

Sorry for following up off-topic, but EBS has actually improved considerably 
in the last few years. You can get guaranteed (and very high) IOPS on SSD 
storage, and many instance types come with high-speed throughput to EBS. It's 
much much better for databases than it was 5 years ago.


has it become more stable when Amazon has their occasional major hiccups?


-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alan Hodgson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis, amqp, s3 in the future?
Следующее
От: John R Pierce
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Caching and Blobs in PG? Was: Can PG replace redis,amqp, s3 in the future?