Re: Commit Timestamp and LSN Inversion issue

Hi,

On 2024-11-07 15:05:31 -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 11/7/24 13:19, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I think it's *completely* unacceptable to call a hook inside
> > ReserveXLogInsertLocation, with the spinlock held, no less. That's the most
> > contended section of code in postgres.
> 
> Aside from your technical concerns, can we at least agree that the commit-ts
> vs LSN inversion is a problem that should get addressed?

I'm not against addressing it, but I'd consider it not a high priority and
that the acceptable cost (both runtime and maintenance) of it should would
need to be extremely low.

Greetings,

Andres Freund