Rod Taylor wrote:
>>The references are all to the same table i.e. they are employee ids, so
>>leaving some and not others would make no sense. The table has no
>>deletes, small amount of inserts and moderate amount of updates. However
>>there are many selects and its their performance I am most concerned with.
>
>
> Foreign keys have no impact on selects.
>
> Although this does sound like a rather strange design to me (20+ columns
> wide and they're all employee ids?)
There are more than 20 fieldss. Its a report that can get updated by
different employees and we wish to keep a record of which employee
completed which section. Couldn't think of any other way to do it.