Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
Дата | |
Msg-id | be953889-ba0f-4b4e-8a7c-ec03cbf270b2@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-03-11 Tu 1:52 PM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> On 2025-Mar-11, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote: >> >>> In map.dat file, I tried to fix this issue by adding number of characters >>> in dbname but as per code comments, as of now, we are not supporting \n\r >>> in dbnames so i removed handling. >>> I will do some more study to fix this issue. >> Yeah, I think this is saying that you should not consider the contents >> of map.dat as a shell string. After all, you're not going to _execute_ >> that file via the shell. >> >> Maybe for map.dat you need to escape such characters somehow, so that >> they don't appear as literal newlines/carriage returns. > I haven't looked at the code for this, but why are we inventing an > ad-hoc file format? Why not use JSON, like we do for backup manifests? > Then storing arbitrary database names won't be a problem. > I'm not sure everyone thinks that was a good idea for backup manifests (in fact I know some don't), and it seems somewhat like overkill for a simple map of oids to database names. cheers andrew > > -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: