Re: Moving to Postgresql database
| От | Jim Nasby | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Moving to Postgresql database | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | bd81fa1b-d00b-4c4f-9796-21509d8518c5@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Moving to Postgresql database (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
On 1/16/24 11:59 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > Hi. One of the biggest pitfall of PostgreSQL, from the app-dev > > perspective, > > > is the fact any failed statement fails the whole > transaction, with > > > ROLLBACK as the only recourse. > > > > "SAVEPOINT establishes a new savepoint within the current > transaction. > > > > > > I wish it was that easy. > > I've been scared away from using them, after reading a few > articles... > > Also, that incurs extra round trips to the server, from the extra > commands. > > The point was that '... with ROLLBACK as the only recourse.' is not > the > case. There is an alternative, whether you want to use it being a > separate question. > > > Performance-killing alternatives are not really altternatives. What's the actual performance issue here? I'm also wondering what the use case for constantly retrying errors is. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Austin TX
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: